Costo-efectividad de la calidad del control prenatal con respecto al bajo peso al nacer en el Cauca / Antenatal control quality cost-effectiveness regarding low birth weight in Cauca

Antecedentes: El departamento del Cauca en Colombia es multiétnico, multicultural y biodiverso, también con grandes diferencias en bajo peso al nacer (BPN), mortalidad perinatal y mortalidad neonatal tardía entre municipios. Objetivo: Determinar la relación de costo-efectividad del control prenatal (CPN) cuando ha tenido buena calidad frente al que ha tenido calidad deficiente con respecto al BPN en el departamento del Cauca entre 2018 y 2020. Método: Evaluación económica con diseño epidemiológico de una cohorte histórica desde la perspectiva de la institución pagadora. Se calculó la razón incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE), análisis de sensibilidad e impacto presupuestal. Resultados: La incidencia de BPN fue del 8,3% (348/4182). La calidad deficiente en el CPN incrementó el riesgo de BPN (OR: 3,38; IC95%: 1,05-8,2) y la buena calidad tuvo una mejor relación de costo-efectividad (RICE: USD 2727,75), con posición dominante frente a la calidad deficiente (6,14 veces el PIB per cápita de ahorro) y con un impacto presupuestal de USD 2.904.392. Conclusiones: La buena calidad del CPN en el departamento del Cauca durante 2018-2020 fue costo-efectiva y dominante por ser de menor costo y mayor efectividad.

Background: The department of Cauca in Colombia is multiethnic, multicultural, and biodiverse, also with large differences in low birth weight (LBW), perinatal mortality, and late neonatal mortality among municipalities. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness relationship of antenatal care (ANC) when it has had good quality compared to that which has had poor quality with respect to low birth weight in the department of Cauca between 2018 and 2019. Method: Economic evaluation with epidemiological cohort design historical from the perspective of the payer institution. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE), sensitivity analysis, and budgetary impact were calculated. Results: The incidence of LBW was 8.3% (348/4182). Poor quality in ANC increased the risk of LBW (OR: 3.38; CI95%: 1.05-8.2), good quality had a better cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE: USD 2727.75), with dominant position against poor quality (6.14 times the GDP/capita savings) with a budgetary impact of USD 2,904,392. Conclusions: The good quality of the ANC in the department of Cauca during 2018-2020 was cost-effective and dominant because it is lower cost and more effective.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 tests in the unified health system.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio and economic impact of the Rapid Antigen Test (TR-Ag) to replace RT-PCR for the detection of the new Coronavirus in the Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: This is a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clinical protocols were used for the diagnosis of COVID-19 at the São José Municipal Hospital, located in the city of Itaberá-SP. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was divided into two scenarios. In the first, the accuracy reported by the test manufacturers was included, and in the second, the cost resulting from a systematic review. Both were compared with the performance of the RT-PCR test. The increase in diagnoses was chosen as a health outcome and absenteeism was used as a criterion for assessing the economic impact. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of R$ 42,136.67 and R$ 68,329.73 for every thousand tests, according to the accuracy of the manufacturers' TR-Ag tests and what is reported in the literature in relation to RT-PCR, respectively. The average value found for the RT-PCR test (R$ 202.87) represents an increase of 165.32% in cost in relation to the value found for the TR-Ag. 4,305 tests were performed between April 2020 and December 2021 at the referral hospital. Also, maintaining the use of RT-PCR as the first choice for diagnosing COVID-19 and regulating absenteeism in the economically active population could have an impact of up to R$ 1,022,779.68 on municipal management. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the TR-Ag are configured as a cost-effective alternative for the SUS in the detection of the new Coronavirus. The strategy becomes economically favorable for the expansion of testing, combating the COVID-19 pandemic and reducing the impact on the local economy. However, studies are needed to validate the accuracy of the tests so that economic evaluations on the subject are more assertive.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cinacalcet vs. paricalcitol in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism secondary to chronic kidney disease / Análise de custo-efetividade do cinacalcete vs. paricalcitol no tratamento do hiperparatireoidismo secundário à doença renal crônica

ABSTRACT Introduction For the reduction of PTH levels, two classes of drugs are available in the Brazilian market: non-selective and selective vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics. Among the mentioned drugs, the SUS provides oral calcitriol, paricalcitol and cinacalcet. Objectives: Develop cost-effectiveness (CE) and budgetary impact (BI) analysis of cinacalcet versus paricalcitol for patients on dialysis with SHPT, from the perspective of SUS. Methodology: A decision tree model was constructed for CE analysis, which considered the outcome of avoided parathyroidectomy and a time horizon of 1 year. As for the BI analysis, two scenarios were considered, one of which was measured demand and other epidemiological, based on data from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (BSN). Results: The CE analysis showed that the use of cinacalcet results in one-off savings of R$1,394.64 per year and an incremental effectiveness of 0.08, in relation to avoided parathyroidectomy. The incremental CE ratio (ICER) was - R$ 17,653.67 per avoided parathyroidectomy for cinacalcet, as it was more effective and cheaper compared to paricalcitol. As for the BI analysis, it was estimated that the incremental BI with the expansion of the use of cinacalcet in the SUS will be between - R$ 1,640,864.62 and R$ 166,368.50 in the first year, considering the main and the epidemiological scenarios. At the end of 5 years after the expansion of use, an BI was estimated between - R$ 10,740,743.86 and - R$ 1,191,339.37; considering the same scenarios. Conclusion: Cinacalcet was dominant to avoid parathyroidectomies, being cost-effective.

RESUMO Introdução: Para a redução dos níveis do paratormônio (PTH) estão disponíveis no mercado brasileiro duas classes de medicamentos: ativadores do receptor da vitamina D (não seletivos e seletivos) e calcimiméticos. Dentre os medicamentos supracitados, o SUS disponibiliza calcitriol oral, paricalcitol e cinacalcete. Objetivos: Desenvolver análise de custo-efetividade (CE) e de impacto orçamentário (IO) do cinacalcete versus paricalcitol para pacientes em diálise com HPTS, na perspectiva do SUS. Metodologia: Foi construído um modelo de árvore de decisão para a análise de CE, que considerou o desfecho paratireoidectomia evitada e um horizonte temporal de 1 ano. Quanto à análise de IO, foram considerados dois cenários, um de demanda aferida e outro de abordagem epidemiológica, baseado nos dados da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN). Resultados: A análise de CE mostrou que o uso de cinacalcete resulta em economia de R$ 1.394,64 ao ano e efetividade incremental de 0,08, em relação a paratireoidectomia evitada. A razão de CE incremental (RCEI) foi de - R$ 17.653,67 por paratireoidectomia evitada para o cinacalcete, já que se mostrou mais efetivo e mais barato comparado ao paricalcitol. Estimou-se que o IO incremental com a ampliação do uso do cinacalcete no SUS estará entre - R$ 1.640.864,62 e R$ 166.368,50 no primeiro ano, considerando os cenários principal e epidemiológico baseado nos dados da SBN. Já ao final de 5 anos após a ampliação do uso, estimou-se um impacto incremental entre - R$ 10.740.743,86 e - R$ 1.191.339,37; considerando os mesmos cenários. Conclusão: Cinacalcete foi dominante para evitar paratireoidectomias, sendo custo-efetivo.

Cost effectiveness of intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis and its efficacy in preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in a referral hospital / Custo-efetividade da profilaxia com cefuroxima intracameral e sua eficácia na prevenção da endoftalmite após cirurgia de catarata em um hospital de referência

ABSTRACT Purpose: To present the results of a retrospective study regarding the clinical and economic impact of intracameral cefuroxime administration to prevent endophthalmitis during cataract surgery in a referral hospital. Methods: This study included 16,902 eyes from patients who had undergone cataract surgery between 2013 and 2017. From May 2014 onwards, all patients received routine intracameral injections of 1 mg cefuroxime (10 mg/1 mL) after phacoemulsification. The prophylactic efficacy was evaluated using the relative risk ratio, whereas the economic impact was evaluated using number needed to treat to avoid endophthalmitis. Results: Before introducing cefuroxime, 3,407 cataract surgeries were performed using the phacoemulsification technique, and 7 post-operatory cases of endophthalmitis occurred (0.2% incidence). After introducing the cefuroxime protocol, 13,495 surgeries were performed, and 4 endophthalmitis cases were registered (0.03% incidence). Cefuroxime was identified as a protective factor against the development of endophthalmitis [risk ratio = 14%, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI) 95%, 4%-49%], with an economic impact of number needed to treat = 568. The potential savings with cefuroxime was approximately US $2,334.36 for every 568 patients treated. Conclusion: The incidence of endophthalmitis decreased by 86% (risk ratio = 14%, p=0.002, 95% CI, 4%-49%) after introducing intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis at the study hospital. The results presented herein provide strong evidence for the use of cefuroxime in endophthalmitis prophylaxis after phacoemulsification surgeries, outperforming the alter­native by providing both economic and clinical benefits.

RESUMO Objetivo: Apresentar os resultados de um estudo retrospectivo sobre o impacto clínico e econômico da administração de cefuroxima intracameral para prevenir endoftalmite nas cirurgias de catarata em um hospital de referência. Métodos: Este estudo incluiu 16.902 olhos de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de catarata entre 2013 e 2017. A partir de maio de 2014, todos os pacientes receberam rotineiramente uma injeção intracameral de 1mg de cefuroxima (10mg/1mL) ao final da cirurgia de facoemulsificação. A eficácia da profilaxia foi avaliada usando o risco relativo e o impacto econômico foi avaliado com o número necessário para tratar para se evitar um caso de endoftalmite. Resultados: Antes da introdução do protocolo da cefuroxima, foram realizadas 3.407 cirurgias de catarata por facoemulsificação e ocorreram 7 casos de endoftalmite pós-operatória (incidência de 0,2%). Após a introdução do protocolo da cefuroxima, foram realizadas 13.495 cirurgias e registrados 4 casos de endoftalmite (incidência de 0,03%). A cefuroxima foi um fator de proteção no desenvolvimento de endoftalmite (risco relativo = 14%, p=0,002, Intervalo de Confiança de 95% [IC 95%], 4% - 49%) e o impacto econômico do número necessário para tratar = 568. A economia potencial com a cefuroxima foi de aproximadamente US$ 2.334,36 para cada 568 pacientes tratados. Conclusão: A incidência de endoftalmite diminuiu 86% (risco relativo = 14%, p=0,002, IC 95% 4% - 49%) desde a introdução da profilaxia com cefuroxima intracameral no hospital do estudo. Os resultados apresentados mostram forte evidência para o uso da cefuroxima na profilaxia da endoftalmite após cirurgias de facoemulsificação, por proporcionar economia de custos e benefício clínico.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing therapeutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71 195.40/QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 3× threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravenous paricalcitol vs. oral calcitriol in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism secondary to chronic kidney disease / Análise de custo-efetividade do paricalcitol intravenoso vs. calcitriol oral no tratamento do hiperparatireoidismo secundário à doença renal crônica

Abstract Introduction: Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) secondary to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by high levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands and cardiovascular disease. Selective and non-selective and selective vitamin D-receptor activators, calcimimetics, are available in the Brazilian market to reduce PTH levels. Objectives: To develop a cost-effectiveness (C/E) and budgetary impact (BI) analysis of intravenous paricalcitol vs. oral calcitriol for patients on dialysis with SHPT, from the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health Care System (SUS). Methodology: We built a decision-tree model to analyze C/E, which considered the outcome of avoided death and a time horizon of 1 year. As for the BI analysis, two scenarios were considered, one of demand and one of epidemiological approach, based on data from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology. Results: The analysis showed that the C/E ratio was R$ 1,213.68 per year, and an incremental effectiveness of 0.032, referring to avoided death. The incremental C/E ratio was R$37,927.50 per death averted by paricalcitol. It was estimated that the incremental BI with the expansion of paricalcitol use will be between R$1,600,202.28 and R$4,128,565.65 in the first year, considering the main and epidemiological scenarios. At the end of 5 years after the expansion of its use, an incremental BI was estimated between R$ 48,596,855.50 and R$ 62,90,555.73. Conclusion: Intravenous paricalcitol has superior efficacy and similar safety to oral calcitriol, reducing the overall mortality of dialysis patients, although it implies a higher cost.

Resumo Introdução: O hiperparatireoidismo secundário (HPTS) à doença crônica renal (DRC) é caracterizado por elevados níveis de paratormônio (PTH), hiperplasia das glândulas paratireoides e doença cardiovascular. Para a redução dos níveis do PTH, estão disponíveis no mercado brasileiro os ativadores não seletivos e seletivos do receptor da vitamina D e os calcimiméticos. Objetivos: Desenvolver análise de custo-efetividade (C/E) e de impacto orçamentário (IO) do paricalcitol intravenoso vs. calcitriol oral para pacientes em diálise com HPTS, na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. Metodologia: Foi construído um modelo de árvore de decisão para a análise de C/E, que considerou o desfecho morte evitada e um horizonte temporal de 1 ano. Quanto à análise de IO, foram considerados dois cenários, sendo um de demanda aferida e um de abordagem epidemiológica, baseado nos dados da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. Resultados: A análise mostrou que a relação de C/E foi de R$ 1.213,68 ao ano, e uma efetividade incremental de 0,032, referente à morte evitada. A razão de C/E incremental foi de R$ 37.927,50 por morte evitada para o paricalcitol. Estimou-se que o IO incremental com a ampliação do uso do paricalcitol estará entre R$ 1.600.202,28 e R$ 4.128.565,65 no primeiro ano, considerando os cenários principal e o epidemiológico. Já no fim de 5 anos após a ampliação do uso, estimou-se IO incremental entre R$ 48.596.855,50 e R$ 62.90.555,73. Conclusão: O paricalcitol intravenoso tem eficácia superior e segurança semelhante ao comparador calcitriol oral, diminuindo a mortalidade geral dos pacientes em diálise, embora implique maior custo.

Economic evaluation of fluoride varnish application in preschoolers: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Fluoride varnish (FV) is a convenient way of professionally applying fluoride in preschoolers. However, its modest anticaries effect highlights the need for economic evaluations. AIM: To assess economic evaluations reporting applications of FV to reduce caries incidence in preschoolers. DESIGN: We included full economic evaluations with preschool participants, in which the intervention was FV and the outcome was related to dentin caries. We searched in CENTRAL; MEDLINE via PubMed; WEB OF SCIENCE; EMBASE; SCOPUS; LILACS; BBO; and BVS Economia em saúde, OpenGrey, and EconoLit. Clinical trial registers, thesis and dissertations, and meeting abstracts were hand searched, as well as 11 dental journals. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Philips' and Drummond's (full and simplified) tools. RESULTS: Titles and abstracts of 2871 articles were evaluated, and 200 were read in full. Eight cost-effectiveness studies were included: five modeling and three within-trial evaluations. None of the studies gave sufficient information to allow a thorough assessment using the bias tools. We did not combine the results of the studies due to the great heterogeneity among them. Four studies reported that FV in preschool children was a cost-effective measure, but in one of these studies, sealants and fluoride toothpaste were more cost-effective measures than the varnish, and three studies used limited data that compromised the generalizability of their results. The other four studies showed a large increase in costs due to the application of varnish and/or low cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: We did not find convincing overall evidence that applying FV in preschoolers is an anticaries cost-effective measure. The protocol of this systematic review is available at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/xw5va/).

Cost-effectiveness and Acceptance in Children and Parents of the Hall Technique: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and acceptance of children and their parents of the Hall technique (HT) for dental rehabilitation in pediatric dentistry. BACKGROUND: The approach of the HT is that of minimally invasive treatment of the dental element and is used exclusively on primary molars. Various studies in the literature point to HT as a restorative option well accepted by children and parents and quite predictable, with low retreatment rates and good cost-effectiveness for the management of primary molars with carious lesions. However, no systematic review in the literature has approached randomized clinical trials on these topics to produce a high level of evidence and help establish clinical HT protocols. REVIEW RESULTS: Eight articles were selected for the systematic review. The HT was more cost-effective than procedures using other restorative materials. Regarding acceptance, in terms of esthetics, high percentages of satisfaction were reported for parents and children, with a divergence between studies in the comparison of esthetic preference with atraumatic restorative treatment. However, when considering crown cementation pain, comfort, anxiety, preference, and satisfaction, the HT was generally better evaluated when compared to other restorative materials. CONCLUSION: The HT is an excellent restorative option when considering cost-effectiveness and acceptance and is recommended for use in daily clinical practice. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results indicate that HT is superior to other restorative materials regarding its acceptance by children and parents in terms of pain, comfort, anxiety, and crown preference and satisfaction. There were also high percentages of satisfaction with esthetics. Hall technique may initially appear expensive for dentists, but its effectiveness over time and the lesser need for consultations and reinventions ensure better cost-benefit than other restorative materials. How to cite this article: Valentim FB, Moreira KMS, Carneiro VC, et al. Cost-effectiveness and Acceptance in Children and Parents of the Hall Technique: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):1016-1025.

Risk of acute kidney injury and cost-effectiveness analysis comparing vancomycin and linezolid for the treatment of pediatric patients infected with Gram-positive bacteria / Risco de lesão renal aguda e custo-efetividade comparando vancomicina e linezolida para o tratamento de pacientes pediátricos infectados por bactérias Gram-positivas

Objective: This study aimed to compare the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients who used vancomycin (VAN) or linezolid (LNZ) to treat Gram-positive coccus (GPC) infections and to assess which treatment (VAN or LNZ) is the most cost-effective considering a pediatric hospital perspective. Methods: A retrospective cohort was performed to evaluate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients without previous AKI, with GPC infections that used LNZ, or VAN monitored by serum VAN levels. Initially, descriptive analysis and Fisher and chisquare test were performed for this comparison. Then, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted through a decision tree model. The outcomes of interest were the rate of AKI related to the drug and the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and cure. Results: In patients without previous acute kidney injury (AKI), 20% developed nephrotoxicity associated with VAN versus 9.6% in the LNZ group (p = 0.241). As there was no difference in nephrotoxicity between VAN andlinezolid (LNZ), vancomycin (VAN) monitored by serum VAN levels can optimize and rationalize the treatment. The nephrotoxicity risk criterion should not guide the prescription for LNZ. Furthermore, the average global cost of treatment with VAN was approximately R$ 43,000, while for LNZ, it was R$ 71,000. Conclusion: VAN was considered dominant (lower cost and greater effectiveness) over LNZ for treating patients with GPC infection.

Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou comparar a ocorrência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em pacientes pediátricos que usaram vancomicina (VAN) ou linezolida (LNZ) para tratar infecções por cocos Gram-positivos (CGP) e avaliar qual tratamento (VAN ou LNZ) é o mais custo-efetivo considerando a perspectiva de um hospital pediátrico. Métodos: Foi realizada uma coorte retrospectiva para avaliar a ocorrência de nefrotoxicidade em pacientes pediátricos sem LRA prévia, com infecções por CGP que utilizaram LNZ ou VAN, combinada com vancocinemia. Para essa comparação, inicialmente foram realizados análise descritiva e testes de Fisher e qui-quadrado. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise de custo-efetividade por meio de um modelo de árvore de decisão. Os desfechos de interesse foram a taxa de LRA relacionada ao medicamento e a taxa de internação em unidade de terapia intensiva e cura. Resultados: Nos pacientes sem LRA prévia, 20% deles desenvolveram nefrotoxicidade associada à VAN versus 9,6% no grupo LNZ (p = 0,241). Como não houve diferença na nefrotoxicidade entre VAN e LNZ, a VAN combinada com a vancocinemia pode otimizar e racionalizar o tratamento, e a prescrição de LNZ não deve ser guiada pelo critério de risco de nefrotoxicidade. Além disso, o custo médio global do tratamento com VAN foi de aproximadamente R$ 43.000, enquanto para LNZ foi de R$ 71.000. Conclusão: Assim, a VAN foi considerada dominante (menor custo e maior eficácia) sobre a LNZ para o tratamento de pacientes com infecção por CGP.

Custo efetividade do uso da terlipressina no tratamento da síndrome hepatorrenal / Cost effectiveness of using terlipressin to treat hepatorenal syndrome

ABSTRACT Background Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most severe form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it is associated with high mortality. It is usually diagnosed according to criteria defined by the International Ascites Club. Currently, the most frequently indicated pharmacological therapy for the treatment of HRS is a combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors (terlipressin or norepinephrine) in combination with albumin. With the progressive increase in healthcare spending, it is important to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacological treatment in patients who are diagnosed with HRS. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for the use of terlipressin in combination with albumin to treat HRS in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on secondary data from studies showed the efficacy of terlipressin therapy compared with norepinephrine combined with albumin or albumin alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a sensitivity analysis was developed by varying the values of therapies and probabilities. The Brazilian real was the currency used in the analysis, and the results were converted to US dollars. Results: After selection, eligibility, and evaluation of the quality of publications, the results demonstrated that administration of terlipressin or norepinephrine in combination with albumin in patients diagnosed with HRS type 1 was efficacious. The cost of treatment with terlipressin in combination with albumin was USD $1,644.06, administration of albumin alone was USD $912.02, and norepinephrine plus albumin was USD $2,310.78. Considering that the combination therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the incremental cost of terlipressin and norepinephrine in combination with albumin was USD $666.73, and an effectiveness of 0.570 was found for terlipressin in combination with albumin and 0.200 for norepinephrine in combination with albumin. The incremental effectiveness was 0.370, and the ICER was USD $1,801.97. Thus, the parameters of increasing cost per therapy and ICER indicated that the combined therapy of terlipressin plus albumin was cost effective compared to albumin alone or norepinephrine plus albumin in a public single-payer healthcare system. Conclusion: A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that terlipressin in combination with albumin when administered concomitantly to patients who were diagnosed with type 1 HRS is cost-effective compared to norepinephrine in combination with albumin administered in a controlled environment.

RESUMO Contexto: A Síndrome Hepatorrenal (SHR) é a forma mais grave de lesão renal aguda em pacientes com cirrose avançada, estando diretamente associada a alta taxa de mortalidade. Normalmente é diagnosticada seguindo critérios definidos pela International Ascites Club (IAC). Atualmente, as terapias farmacológicas mais indicadas no tratamento da SHR são a combinação de vasoconstritores esplâncnicos (terlipressina ou norepinefrina) associados à albumina. Com o aumento progressivo dos gastos em saúde, torna-se relevante realizar uma análise de custo-efetividade do tratamento farmacológico em pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR. Objetivo: Realizar avaliação de custo-efetividade do uso da terlipressina associada à albumina no tratamento da SHR em pacientes com cirrose. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-efetividade, com base em dados secundários de estudos publicados com resultado da eficácia da terapia com terlipressina, em comparação com norepinefrina combinada com albumina ou apenas albumina. A análise de custo-efetividade foi calculada usando a razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) e uma análise de sensibilidade foi desenvolvida variando os valores das terapias e probabilidades. O real foi a moeda utilizada na análise. Resultados: Após a seleção, elegibilidade e avaliação da qualidade das publicações, os resultados demonstraram que a administração da associação de terlipressina ou norepinefrina com albumina em pacientes diagnosticados com SHR tipo 1 possui eficácia comprovada. Os custos do tratamento com a terapia combinada de terlipressina com albumina foram de USD $1,644.06, administração de somente albumina USD $912.02 e norepinefrina mais albumina USD $2,310.78. Considerando as terapias combinadas com efetividade terapêutica comprovada, isto é, terlipressina e norepinefrina associada a albumina, o custo incremental foi de USD $666.73 e efetividade de 0,570 para o grupo da terlipressina associada a albumina e de 0,200 para o grupo da norepinefrina associada a albumina. A efetividade incremental foi de 0,370 e o valor da RCEI foi de USD $1,801.97. Assim, os fatores de incremento do custo por terapia e razão de custo-efetividade incremental definem que a terapia combinada de terlipressina mais albumina é custo efetiva quando comparada a administração de somente albumina ou norepinefrina no cenário do sistema único de saúde. Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou por meio de uma análise de custo-efetividade que a terlipressina associada à albumina quando administrada concomitantemente a pacientes com diagnóstico de SHR tipo 1 é custo-efetiva quando comparada à albumina sozinha e com norepinefrina associada à albumina administrada em um ambiente controlado.

Blinatumomabe em pacientes pediátricos com leucemia linfoblástica aguda B em primeira recidiva de alto risco: um estudo de custo-efetividade / Blinatumomab in high-risk first relapse pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Objetivo: Estimar a custo-efetividade do blinatumomabe como novo padrão no tratamento de consolidação de pacientes pediátricos com leucemia linfoblástica aguda de células precursoras B (LLA-B) em primeira recidiva de alto risco. Métodos: Um modelo de sobrevida particionado com horizonte lifetime e ciclo de quatro semanas foi construído na perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Sobrevida livre de eventos e sobrevida global foram extrapoladas com base no ensaio clínico 20120215, usando funções paramétricas. A taxa de desconto foi de 5%. O impacto de variações em pressupostos foi explorado em análises de cenário. Resultados: O custo lifetime com desconto para o caso base foi de R$ 351.615 para blinatumomabe contra R$ 97.770 para HC3 (grupo controle de quimioterapia-padrão), com ganho de 9,96 e 6,74 anos de vida ajustados para qualidade (QALYs), respectivamente. A razão de custo-efetividade incremental (RCEI) foi de R$ 78.873/QALY. Considerando um cenário sem descontos, a RCEI foi de R$ 33.731/QALY ganho. Os outros cenários com maior impacto na RCEI foram a exclusão do desperdício de blinatumomabe (isto é, considerando que a sobra em frasco-ampola de um paciente seria reaproveitada para outro paciente: R$ 35.751) e a alteração do tempo de infusão (troca de bolsa em 48 ou 96 horas em vez de 24 horas: R$ 35.515). A probabilidade de o blinatumomabe ser custo-efetivo foi de 65,7% na análise probabilística, considerando um limiar de R$ 95.501. Conclusões: Blinatumomabe é custo-efetivo para pacientes pediátricos com LLA-B derivada em primeira recidiva de alto risco na perspectiva do SUS.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of blinatumomab as the new standard treatment of consolidation in high-risk first relapse pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Methods: A partitioned survival model with a lifetime horizon and a 4-week cycle was developed from the Brazilian public healthcare payer's perspective (SUS). Event-free survival and overall survival were extrapolated based on data from the 20120215 clinical trial using parametric functions. A 5% discount rate was used, and the impact of variations in model parameters and assumptions were explored in scenario analyses. Results: The discounted base case lifetime cost was R$ 351,615 for blinatumomab vs. R$ 97,770 for standard chemotherapy control group (HC3), with 9.96 QALYs gained with blinatumomab vs. 6.74 QALYs gained with HC3. The incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) was R$ 78,873/QALY. Considering an undiscounted scenario, the ICER was.

Impacto del uso de las técnicas moleculares (PCR) en la detección y el éxito erradicador frente a Helicobacter pylori / Impact of the use of molecular techniques (PCR) on detection and eradication success against Helicobacter pylori

Introducción: La infección por Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) afecta a más del 50% de la población mundial. El aumento en las resistencias antibióticas es la principal causa del fracaso del tratamiento. El objetivo principal fue analizar el éxito erradicador tras la aplicación de las nuevas recomendaciones de tratamiento ESPGHAN e introducción de la PCR como técnica de diagnóstico directo, describir la evolución del patrón local de resistencias antibióticas y valorar el coste-efectividad de la aplicación de la PCR aislada o en conjunto con el cultivo como estrategia diagnóstica. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo del total de aislamientos microbiológicos de H. pylori entre 2013-2019 en nuestro centro, mediante comparación del porcentaje de resistencias y éxito erradicador entre los periodos 2013-2016 y 2017-2019. Estudio de coste-efectividad de las pruebas de diagnóstico directo, comparando 3 opciones distintas: cultivo y PCR, solo cultivo, y solo PCR. Resultados: Se incluyó a 192 pacientes, 98 fueron detectados por cultivo (2013-2016) y 94 por cultivo o PCR (2017-2019). Se instauró tratamiento antibiótico en 153 pacientes, 90 en el primer periodo (pautas ESPGHAN 2011: porcentaje erradicación 62,2%), 63 en el segundo (pautas ESPGHAN 2017: porcentaje erradicación: 73%). Se observó un aumento en las resistencias a claritromicina, pasando de un 16,3% (n=16) en el primer periodo a un 53,2% (n=48) entre 2017-2019 (98% detectadas por PCR, 60% por cultivo). No hubo diferencias en el resto de resistencias antibióticas. La solicitud aislada de la PCR presentó una ratio de análisis de coste-efectividad (CEAR) de 71,91, en comparación con un 92,16 del cultivo y un 96,35 del cultivo y la PCR de forma conjunta. (AU)

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection affects more than 50% of the world population. Increased antibiotic resistance is the main cause of treatment failure. The main objective was to analyze the eradication success after the application of the new ESPGHAN treatment recommendations and the introduction of PCR as a direct diagnosis technique, describe the evolution of the local pattern of antibiotic resistance, and assess the cost-effectiveness of PCR application, isolated or in conjunction with culture as a diagnostic strategy. Patients and methods: retrospective descriptive study of all microbiological isolates of H. pylori in 2013-2019 in our center, by comparing the percentage of resistance and eradication success between the periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2019. Cost-effectiveness study of direct diagnostic tests, comparing 3 different options: culture and PCR; only culture; PCR only. Results: 192 patients were included, 98 were detected by culture (2013-2016) and 94 by culture and / or PCR (2017-2019). Antibiotic treatment was established in 153 patients, 90 in the first period (2011 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage 62.2%), 63 in the second (2017 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage: 73%). An increase in resistance to clarithromycin was observed, going from 16.3% (n=16) in the first period, to 53.2% (n=48) in 2017-2019 (98% detected by PCR, 60% by culture). There were no differences in the rest of antibiotic resistances. The isolated PCR application presented a cost-effectiveness analysis ratio (CEAR) of 71.91, compared to 92.16 for the culture and 96.35 for the culture and PCR combined. (AU)

Impact of the use of molecular techniques (PCR) on detection and eradication success against Helicobacter pylori.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori infection affects more than 50% of the world population. Increased antibiotic resistance is the main cause of treatment failure. The main objective was to analyze the eradication success after the application of the new ESPGHAN treatment recommendations and the introduction of PCR as a direct diagnosis technique, describe the evolution of the local pattern of antibiotic resistance, and assess the cost-effectiveness of PCR application, isolated or in conjunction with culture as a diagnostic strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of all microbiological isolates of Helicobacter pylori in 2013-2019 in our center, by comparing the percentage of resistance and eradication success between the periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2019. Cost-effectiveness study of direct diagnostic tests, comparing 3 different options: culture and PCR; only culture; PCR only. RESULTS: 192 patients were included, 98 were detected by culture (2013-2016) and 94 by culture and/or PCR (2017-2019). Antibiotic treatment was established in 153 patients, 90 in the first period (2011 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage 62.2%), 63 in the second (2017 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage: 73%). An increase in resistance to clarithromycin was observed, going from 16.3% (n=16) in the first period, to 53.2% (n=48) in 2017-2019 (98% detected by PCR, 60% by culture). There were no differences in the rest of antibiotic resistances. The isolated PCR application presented a cost-effectiveness analysis ratio (CEAR) of 71.91, compared to 92.16 for the culture and 96.35 for the culture and PCR combined. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the ESPGHAN 2017 guidelines achieved greater eradication success, although less than that observed in previous publications, without reaching the target of at least 90%. An increase in resistance to macrolides was observed, without being able to discriminate whether it is a real increase or a greater diagnostic sensitivity of molecular techniques, with the isolated request for PCR being the most cost-effective strategy.

Custos e benefícios da atenção domiciliar para pessoas com condições crônicas complexas: revisão integrativa / Costos y beneficios de la atención domiciliaria para personas con condiciones crónicas complejas: revisión integrativa / Costs and benefits of home care for people with complex chronic conditions: an integrative review

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar os custos e benefícios da atenção domiciliar de adultos ou idosos com condições crônicas complexas (CCC). Método: revisão integrativa, relatada segundo o Preferred Reporting Items for Syste matic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Os resultados foram submetidos à análise narrativa. Resultados: A amostra final foi de 18 estudos, publicados no período de 2008 a 2021.As CCC identificadas foram insuficiência cardíaca grave, doença renal crônica, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica,múltiplas condições crônicas, pacientes sob quimioterapia e em cuidados paliativos. A modalidade de atenção domiciliar prevalente foi o monitoramento adistância. Conclusão: Identificou-se redução de custos entre 23,9% e 67,1%, com variações entre os componentes analisados e as metodologias utilizadas para o cálculo. Os benefícios incluem diminuição de hospitalizações; redução de exacerbações de sintomas e do uso de serviços de saúde, melhoria na qualidade de vida e controle mais eficaz das condições crônicas complexas com autocuidado e autogerenciamento.

RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar los costos y beneficios de la atención domiciliaria a adultos o ancianos con condiciones crónicas complejas (CCC). Método: revisión integrativa, relatada según el PreferredReportingItemsforSysteMaticReviews and Meta-Analyses. Los resultados fueron sometidos al análisis narrativo. Resultados: la muestra final fue de 18 estudios, publicados en el período de 2008 a 2021. Las CCC identificadas fueron insuficiencia cardíaca grave, enfermedad renal crónica, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, múltiples condiciones crónicas, pacientes bajo quimioterapia y en cuidados paliativos. La modalidad de atención domiciliaria prevalente fue el monitoreo a distancia. Conclusión: se identificó reducción de costos entre el 23,9% y el 67,1%, con variaciones entre los componentes analizados y las metodologías utilizadas para el cálculo. Los beneficios incluyen disminución de hospitalizaciones; reducción de exacerbaciones de síntomas y del uso de servicios de salud, mejora en la calidad de vida y un control más eficaz de las condiciones crónicas complejas con autocuidado y autogestión.

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the costs and benefits of home care for adults or elderly with complex chronic conditions (CCC). Method: Integrative Review, reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews. The results were submitted to the Narrative analysis final sample was 18 studies, published from 2008 to 2021. The CCC identified were severe heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple chronic conditions, patients undergoing chemotherapy and palliative care. The prevalent mode of home care was remote monitoring. Conclusion: Cost reduction was identified between 23.9% and 67.1%, with variations between the components analyzed and the methodologies used for the calculation. The benefits include decreased hospitalizations; reduced exacerbations of symptoms and use of health services, improved quality of life and more effective control of complex chronic conditions with self-care and self-management.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the implementation of advanced practice nursing: how to move forward? / Análisis costo-efectividad de la aplicación de enfermería de práctica avanzada: ¿cómo avanzar? / Análise custo-efetividade da implementação da enfermagem de práticas avançadas: como avançar?

ABSTRACT This essay explores possibilities of advances in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in advanced practice nursing (APN). The arguments were structured according to the current health landscape, the need to evaluate APN practices as health technology and evidence and recommendations for conducting CEA. Benefits of APN were evidenced in the improvement of indicators such as mortality, hospital readmission, among others. However, the absence of a standard of care, combined with the existence of different models and short time horizon interfered with the estimation of direct costs. The studies on CEA were inconclusive, mainly due to the lack of cost per unit of success and calculation of the CEA ratio. In the context of the APN, to conduct CEA that really contributes to robust results, thus subsidizing decision-making requires a joint effort of training institutions, delimitation and standardization of practice by regulatory agencies of the profession and health services, based especially on accreditation policies.

RESUMEN Este ensayo explora las posibilidades de avances en la evaluación de costo-efectividad (ECA) de la enfermería de práctica avanzada (EPA). Los argumentos se estructuraron según el escenario de salud actual, la necesidad de evaluar las prácticas de la EPA, como tecnología sanitaria, evidencia y recomendaciones para realizar análisis de costo-efectividad. Los beneficios de la enfermería de práctica avanzada se evidenciaron en la mejora de los indicadores como mortalidad, reingreso hospitalario, entre otros. Sin embargo, la falta de un estándar de cuidados, combinado con la existencia de diferentes modelos y el corto plazo, interfirió en la estimación de los costos directos. Los estudios no fueron concluyentes sobre el análisis de costo-efectividad, principalmente debido a la falta de costo por unidad de éxito y cálculo de la relación ACE. En el contexto de la enfermería de práctica avanzada, la realización de análisis de costo-efectividad que contribuya a resultados robustos apoyando la toma de decisiones requiere un esfuerzo conjunto de las instituciones de formación, delimitación y estandarización de la práctica por parte de los organismos reguladores de la profesión y los servicios de salud fundamentados, especialmente, en las políticas de acreditación.

RESUMO O presente ensaio explora possibilidades de avanços na avaliação custo-efetividade (ACE) da enfermagem de práticas avançadas (EPA). Os argumentos foram estruturados segundo o panorama de saúde atual, necessidade de avaliação das práticas da EPA, como tecnologia em saúde, evidências e recomendações para condução de análise custo-efetividade. Benefícios da enfermagem de práticas avançadas foram evidenciados na melhora de indicadores como mortalidade, readmissão hospitalar, entre outros. Todavia, a ausência de um padrão de cuidados, combinada com a existência de modelos distintos e curto horizonte temporal, interferiram na estimativa de custos diretos. Os estudos foram inconclusivos acerca da análise custo-efetividade, sobretudo pela ausência de custo por unidade de sucesso e cálculo da razão ACE. No contexto da enfermagem de práticas avançadas, a condução de análise custo-efetividade que contribua com resultados robustos, subsidiando na tomada de decisões, requer esforço conjunto de instituições formadoras, delimitação e normatização da prática por órgãos reguladores da profissão e, de serviços de saúde, alicerçados, especialmente em políticas de acreditação.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy for Primary Prevention Patients with Additional Risk Factors in Brazil

Abstract Background: Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) therapy for primary prevention (PP) of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is well-established but underutilized globally. The Improve SCA study has identified a cohort of patients called 1.5 primary prevention (1.5PP), based on PP patients with the presence of documented risk factors: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, frequent premature ventricular contractions, left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%, and pre-syncope or syncope. Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy compared to no ICD among 1.5PP patients in the Brazilian public healthcare system. Methods: Modified inputs to a published Markov model were applied to compare costs and outcomes of ICD therapy to no ICD therapy from the Brazilian payer's perspective. Mortality and utility estimates were obtained from the IMPROVE SCA trial. Additional effectiveness inputs were sourced from the literature. Cost inputs were obtained from the Brazilian Unified Health System and the Ministry of Health. Costs were discounted at 4.7%; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.45%. This study applied a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of three times Brazil's gross domestic product (GDP) in 2017, R$105,723 (Brazilian Real). Results: The total discounted lifetime costs for ICD therapy were R$100,920 compared to R$43,866 for no ICD therapy. Total discounted QALYs for ICD therapy and no ICD therapy were 9.85 and 7.15, respectively. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was R$21,156 per QALY and less than the R$105,723 WTP threshold. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with base case results. Conclusions: ICD therapy compared to no ICD therapy is cost-effective in the 1.5PP population in Brazil. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Estimation of the Width of Uncertainty in Care Consumption and Costs When Using Common Data Collection Tools in Economic Evaluations: A Benchmark for Sensitivity Analyses.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the uncertainty related to the use of common collection tools to assess costs in economic evaluations compared with an exhaustive administrative database. METHODS: A pragmatic study was performed using preexisting cost-effectiveness studies. Patients were probabilistically matched with themselves in the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), and all their reimbursed hospital and ambulatory care data during the study were extracted. Outcomes included the ratio of the number of each type of resources consumed using trial data (case report forms for ambulatory care and local hospital data for hospital care) versus the SNDS and the ratio of corresponding costs. Mean ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using bootstrapping. The impact of the collection tool on the result of the economic evaluation was calculated with the difference in costs between the 2 treatment arms with both collection methods. RESULTS: Five cost-effectiveness studies were included in the analysis. A total of 397 patients had the SNDS hospital data, and 321 had ambulatory care data. Common collection tools underestimated hospital admissions by 13% (95% CI 8-20), corresponding costs by 5% (95% CI 2-14), and ambulatory acts by 41% (95% CI 33-51), with large variations in costs depending on the study. There was no change in the economic conclusion in any study. CONCLUSIONS: The use of common collection tools underestimates healthcare resource consumption and its associated costs, particularly for ambulatory care. Our results could provide useful evidence-based estimates to inform sensitivity analyses' parameters in future cost-effectiveness analyses.

Qualidade metodológica das avaliações econômicas de antineoplásicos submetidas à Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) na atualização do rol 2020 ­ Estudo de avaliação crítica / Methodological quality of economic assessments of antineoplastics submitted to Supplementary Health Agency in the update of the 2020 list ­ Critical assessment study

Objetivo: Descrever e analisar criticamente as avaliações econômicas de medicamentos antineoplásicos submetidas à Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) durante o processo de atualização do rol de procedimentos em saúde 2020. Métodos: Estudo transversal de análise crítica dos estudos de avaliação econômica integrantes da documentação submetida à ANS com o objetivo de incorporação no rol de procedimentos. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica foi realizada por meio da ferramenta Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 da Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Resultados: Foram incluídas 49 avaliações econômicas: 22 estudos de custo-efetividade, 10 estudos de custo-utilidade, três estudos de custo-minimização e 14 estudos de custo-efetividade e custo-utilidade. A qualidade metodológica foi considerada, na maior parte (88%), como aceitável ou de baixa qualidade. Conclusão: Estudos de avaliação econômica são fundamentais no processo decisório de incorporação de tecnologias na saúde suplementar. Esta análise crítica sugere que a qualidade dos estudos econômicos apresentados dentro das propostas de incorporação de antineoplásicos durante o processo de atualização do rol 2020 da ANS foi limitada. Inconsistências metodológicas e falta de um relato transparente reduzem a validade e a aplicabilidade dos achados na tomada de decisão.

Objective: To describe and critically appraise the economic evaluations of antineoplastic drugs submitted to the ANS during the process of updating its 2020' list of procedures. Methods: Cross-sectional study of critical analysis of the economic evaluation studies included in the documentation submitted to the ANS with the aim of incorporating them into the list of procedures. The methodological quality assessment was carried out using the Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Results: Overall, 49 economic evaluations were included: 22 cost-effectiveness studies, 10 cost-utility studies, three cost-minimization studies and 14 mixed economic studies. Methodological quality was mostly considered as acceptable or low quality. Conclusion: Economic evaluation studies are fundamental in the decision-making process of incorporating technologies into supplementary health care. This critical appraisal suggests that the quality of the economic studies presented within the proposals to incorporate antineoplastics during the process of updating the ANS 2020 roll was limited. Methodological inconsistencies and lack of transparent reporting reduce the validity and applicability of findings for decision-making

[Impact of the use of molecular techniques (PCR) on detection and eradication success against Helicobacter pylori]. / Impacto del uso de las técnicas moleculares (PCR) en la detección y el éxito erradicador frente a Helicobacter pylori.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection affects more than 50% of the world population. Increased antibiotic resistance is the main cause of treatment failure. The main objective was to analyze the eradication success after the application of the new ESPGHAN treatment recommendations and the introduction of PCR as a direct diagnosis technique, describe the evolution of the local pattern of antibiotic resistance, and assess the cost-effectiveness of PCR application, isolated or in conjunction with culture as a diagnostic strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: retrospective descriptive study of all microbiological isolates of H. pylori in 2013-2019 in our center, by comparing the percentage of resistance and eradication success between the periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2019. Cost-effectiveness study of direct diagnostic tests, comparing 3 different options: culture and PCR; only culture; PCR only. RESULTS: 192 patients were included, 98 were detected by culture (2013-2016) and 94 by culture and / or PCR (2017-2019). Antibiotic treatment was established in 153 patients, 90 in the first period (2011 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage 62.2%), 63 in the second (2017 ESPGHAN guidelines: eradication percentage: 73%). An increase in resistance to clarithromycin was observed, going from 16.3% (n=16) in the first period, to 53.2% (n=48) in 2017-2019 (98% detected by PCR, 60% by culture). There were no differences in the rest of antibiotic resistances. The isolated PCR application presented a cost-effectiveness analysis ratio (CEAR) of 71.91, compared to 92.16 for the culture and 96.35 for the culture and PCR combined. CONCLUSIONS: the application of the ESPGHAN 2017 guidelines achieved greater eradication success, although less than that observed in previous publications, without reaching the target of at least 90%. An increase in resistance to macrolides was observed, without being able to discriminate whether it is a real increase or a greater diagnostic sensitivity of molecular techniques, with the isolated request for PCR being the most cost-effective strategy.

Cost-effectiveness of an insertable cardiac monitor to detect atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Background: We assessed cost-effectiveness of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) in a US cryptogenic stroke population. Materials & methods: We modelled lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years for three monitoring strategies post cryptogenic stroke: ICM starting immediately, ICM starting after Holter monitoring (delayed ICM) and standard of care involving intermittent ECG and Holter monitoring. Patient characteristics and detection efficacy were based on the CRYSTAL-AF trial. AF detection altered the modelled anticoagulation therapy and subsequent stroke and bleed risks. Results & conclusion: Immediate ICM was found to be cost-effective versus standard of care and cost-saving versus delayed ICM. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses. ICMs are a cost-effective diagnostic tool for the prevention of recurrent stroke in a US cryptogenic stroke population.